I’ve been on a bit of a TV and movie kick lately.  Just yesterday I was surfing the tube when I came upon Prince of Persia: Sands of Time and decided to indulge.  I had seen the movie once before and remember being a bit disappointed that it didn’t have the same mysterious nature as the game.  The second viewing was better, as I was able to enjoy it as “just a movie” instead of having expectations of greatness because it came from a video game that I loved.  But still, while an okay movie, I can’t help but think it could have been much, much better given its source.

See, I was a huge fan of the first Sands of Time game on the PS2, so I had high expectations for the movie – maybe too high.  I didn’t want an acrobatic action movie that lacked in mystery, suspense and danger.  I wanted the movie to relay the emotions experienced while the Prince was (mostly) alone, fighting his way through a time warped wasteland filled with zombie-like mutations of past friends and family.  I wanted the Prince to use the dagger as an integral means to progress through his journey and not just as a plot device.  I wanted more suspense, more desperation and more connection to the game than simply the sand, the dagger and the acrobatics.

As an action flick, it was okay.  In fact, I’d say it was a step in the right direction for video game movies, because it wasn’t complete crap, but it didn’t match the magic of the game.  I can’t help but wonder why.  Why wouldn’t a game as awesome as Sands of Time make a good movie?  Why didn’t Tomb Raider, Mario Brothers, Street Fighter or any number of other amazing games make good movies?  Some box office success aside, those movies were critical failures in the eyes of most that watched them.  Of all the video game movies I’ve ever seen, I enjoyed Doom and Sands of Time the most, but even the best video game movies are just average.  Why?

While the Sands of Time game was highly praised for its innovative time manipulation mechanic, it’s smooth and fluid acrobatic combat and its platformer puzzles, not too many people praise its story or character development.  That’s nothing new with video games, though, as they’re often designed to allow the player to create a sense of importance and personal story by controlling the character’s actions.  Something like the following passage could be derived from only watching game play in the Sands of Time video game:

“And then the Prince made a daring leap from one broken ledge to another, but his step was off and he fell short, slamming into the side of the ledge and plummeting to his inevitable death before remembering the power he held in his hands.  He pressed and held the button on the top of the dagger and was pulled back through his actions, through time, and stood once again at the edge of the ledge he had just leapt from.  This time he was going to try a different means to pass the chasm.”

As I said, the narrative above wasn’t actually in the game as written word; it was in the game as player action.  Most game narrative doesn’t need to be written, said, or given to guide the player in any way.  The player creates the story.  That experience is one of interactivity and video games excel at it.  Movies, on the other hand, are passive media.  Consumers need only sit and watch the movie to reap the entire benefit that it has to offer.  Movies are designed to take a compelling narrative and give it visual flare (if done well), but a dramatic narrative is very structured and usually linear whereas the interactivity of a game is loose, and can be boring if the linearity is too apparent or forceful.  Interactivity seems to be directly at odds with narrative, and game stories are designed differently for this reason.

To clarify, I’m not saying that games don’t have stories.  I’m saying that movie narrative and game narrative are very different in design and implementation.  I’ve played and enjoyed games with tremendous stories, like the Mass Effect series, but I’ve also played and thoroughly enjoyed games with little to no story.  What I’ve never done is watched and enjoyed a movie that had little to no story.  Movies need a well paced and crafted narrative structure.  An entire movie could consist of a few characters trying to survive while trapped in the cellar of an abandoned house, and it could be a really good movie.  A game would struggle to be fun in a setting like that – what would the player do in such a limited place?  Having a setting that works well for a game and a movie is the first step in developing a good video game movie.  Sands of Time had a great setting for a game, but not so much for a movie, which is why they changed the setting quite a bit – a mistake that never pleases the game’s hardcore fans.

Final Thoughts

Rather than punch out another thousand words in this post alone, I’ve decided to turn this subject into a series of posts.  I haven’t been playing many games lately, so I’ve been lacking writing inspiration (hence the severe lack of posting on the blog), but I have been watching a ton of movies and TV.  Since this is a gaming blog, I didn’t want to write specifically about movies, so a series about video game movies seemed to make the most sense.  In the next couple of posts I’m going to examine and compare the narrative structure used in movies and video games and try to formulate reasoning as to what works and doesn’t work in a video game to movie crossover.  Then I’ll apply that reasoning to write a post about video games that could make great movies, MMOs not excluded since this is an MMO blog, and how they’d have to be handled.  I may even reverse the formula and find out what movies would make exceptional video games – something that happens far more often than the other way around.

Feel free to let me know if there’s any other topics pertaining to video game movies that you’d like to discuss and I’ll try to write a post about it.  Did you like any video game movies and want a list of some of the best out there?  Some people seem to believe that there will never be a top notch movie made from a video game.  Are you of that mindset?  Leave a comment and let me know.  Thanks for reading.

Kudos to Trion for stepping outside the box and taking a chance on some non-traditional MMOs.  They’ve already proven that they can produce a quality game with Rift, which turned out to be a surprising hit – in no small part to its level of polish and its ability to offer gamers something just a little bit different than the norm.  While Rift had similarities to many MMORPGs already released, Trion did tweak a few things to make the game stand out from the crowd; like the open ended class system and the dynamic rifts that seemed to spawn anywhere at any time.

You could describe their first foray into the MMO market as safe, but with a touch of spice.  They didn’t try something off the wall, but they did show a flare for innovation and an ability to exceed expectations.  Those are qualities you want to see in game development.  While making games is very much a business, it’s also a creative endeavor.  Lately we’ve seen the business side of the industry dominate the creative side.  The side effect is stagnation (creative block).  Luckily Trion’s crew seems to be immune to stagnation and have their creative juices flowing.

Now that they’ve got a critical and financial success under their belts, Trion is willing to try some games that are a bit more outside the box.  I’m referring to their games in development: End of Nations and Defiance.  The former is an MMORTS that promises to provide massive strategic battles coupled with progression mechanics and other features usually associated with RPGs.  The latter is an MMOTPS with a SyFy series twisted into the framework of the story (and yes, that’s the television network).  Read on if you’re interest is piqued!

End of Nations

Petroglyph Games, a company founded by members of the team that delivered us Command & Conquer, is actually the company behind the development of End of Nations while Trion Worlds is the publisher and likely the guiding hand for Petroglyph in the single player to MMO transition.  They have a strong background in RTS games and are as good a choice as any to take the AAA leap from single player RTS gaming to MMORTS gaming.  There are a few things to note about the game that stray a bit from some of the older, more traditional RTS games.

  1. The game is less about the resource gathering and buildup phase and more about the tactical combat phase.  In order for players to jump straight into the excitement of world conquest, some of the strategic meta games like resource management have been folded into the combat instead of used as a side (or buildup) task.
  2. Players won’t control massive armies with a need to multitask many facets of a battle at once.  Instead, players will control smaller squads, in the Warhammer 40k: Dawn of War vein, and focus most of their energy on attacking the right area at the right time.  The combat will be massive scale in that there will be many players, each controlling their own squad, battling it out on the map.  Players won’t be getting any Total War sized armies in this game, though.
  3. The game will contain factions, classes and skill trees.  Each faction, at launch, will have two class subsets to choose from.  Those classes can then earn experience points via combat to use in a skill tree as a character would in a traditional MMORPG.

If you’re interested and want to know more, here’s a little video about EoN beta:

Defiance

Defiance isn’t as close to release as End of Nations is, so there’s less info circulating about it, but here’s what I do know about the game:

  1. It’s an MMOTPS, which means a third person shooter with action taking place in a persistent space.  Global Agenda comes to mind when I think MMOTPS.
  2. It’s tied to a show of the same name which is in development now for the SyFy network.  The show and the game are supposed to take place simultaneously in the same universe, so things that happen in the game may affect the show and vice versa.
  3. The game does have progression mechanics and isn’t just a shooter.  I’m assuming character abilities, weapon proficiency and things of that nature will be included.
  4. The setting is post apocalyptic earth 30 years in the future, which isn’t the most original setting, but I love the post apoc because the desperation of the situation creates great drama, so I’m assuming (again) that the story will be above average for a shooter.

For the most detailed explanation of what the game is shaping up to be, check this developer video out:

 

Final Thoughts

With GW2 and other titles really flooding the market, I thought it would be a good idea to remind people that there are other, less popular, games out there that may be real gems.  I guess we’ll see.  Again, I can’t stress enough how thankful I am that Trion (and Petroglyph) is willing to develop some games that aren’t standard online fare.  I truly hope they succeed and inspire other companies to try something unique – though we all know that if they do succeed and one of their games becomes a huge hit that most other companies will simply copy and paste their formula ad nauseam.

Looking forward to End of Nations or Defiance?  Know of any other games that are taking a different approach to the online genre and want to tell me about them?  Leave a comment and let me know.  Thanks for reading.

Wargaming.net needs to make money from their product, so they don’t make it easy to get credits without using gold, which in turn means spending some hard earned cash.  I see plenty of reason to support the developer – World of Tanks has provided me with hours of enjoyment, after all – so I purchase [...]

Playing WoT Again! After nearly 6 months away from the game, I jumped back into the driver’s seat and started playing WoT again!  It’s still as much fun as it was when I first started playing – it’s a blast, if you will.  Part of the reason it was so much fun so quickly is [...]

I, sadly, did not get invited into the last GW2 beta weekend, because I haven’t yet pre-ordered the game.  Shame on me, so depressing, and after reading all the killer information about it and seeing some sexy screenshots, I am jealous.  Since I can’t play the game, I may as well quench my Guild Wars [...]

The title of this post is code for “I’m slacking and now I’m going to justify it with creative excuses”, so here goes: The dog ate my blog post. – A classic excuse with a modern twist. My alarm didn’t go off! – Another classic excuse, but its relevance to a decrease in gaming time [...]

Dr. Leetsauce Interview Number 3! Hey folks!  It’s time for our third exclusive interview with self-proclaimed best gamer in the world, Dr. Leetsauce! For previous interviews with the Greatest Gamer Ever, click the links below: The Greatest Gamer Ever! Dr. Leetsauce: Gaming Habits MMOverflow – We’re excited to have you back for another interview, Dr. [...]

Syp over at Bio Break had a post titled: My Desert Island MMO. Upon reading the title, I thought he was going to describe an MMO he’d like to play that revolved around being stranded on an island.  After reading the first paragraph of the post (and laughing) I realized that it had nothing to [...]

Finally!  I’ve reached part 4 of the SWTOR Leveling Experiment.  If you’re not sure what it is, you can find out by reading the first 3 parts, linked below: SWTOR Leveling Experiment: Introduction SWTOR Leveling Experiment: Class Comparison Chart SWTOR Leveling Experiment: 4 Character Leveling Part 4 in the series has seen a major shift [...]

All games eventually come to an end.  Some games reach that ending as a planned part of the story and fans love it; like Final Fantasy 7, hate it; like Mass Effect 3, or don’t care either way, like games in the Grand Theft Auto series*.  Others end when player skill can’t keep up with [...]

© 2011 MMOverflow.com Privacy Policy Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha